Friday, June 28, 2013
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Whole Child assessment
Today’s demands have changed so I
believe that our assessments should change as well. Students should be required
and measured on student’s mastery of higher-order thinking skills and that they
are able to see the relationships among seemingly diverse concepts (Chang,
1999). Also on their ability to recall, analysis, comparison, inference, and
evaluation. We do not have any test in place to measure these skills. I also
believe that students should be required and measured on their teamwork,
collaboration and creativity skills. We currently assess our students according
to the FCAT. The FCAT is an annual test given to students in grades 3-11 that
measures their skills in the areas of reading, math, science and writing
according to Florida’s Sunshine State Standards. The FCAT is given to students
each year in February (writing) and in March (reading, math, and science). The
areas of reading and math are tested each year in grades 3 through 10. The area
of writing, in addition to reading and math, is tested in grades 4, 8, 10. The
area of science is tested in grade 5, 8, 11. In grade 5 and 8, science is
tested in addition to reading and math. In grade 11, only science is tested.
In England, Silvermail (1996) found
that schools provide multiple measures of performance that serve multiple
purposes. Schools assess student progress through both a national examination and
teacher-made tests when students reach the ages of seven, eleven, fourteen, and
sixteen. These exams are primarily used to measure the effectiveness of the
schools in delivering the national curriculum. All schools must follow
nationally prescribed content and pedagogic methods and set targets for
individual pupil learning (Whetton, Twist, and Sainsbury, 2000). Gipps, Clarke,
and McCallum (1998) assert that this system places too little emphasis on assessment
of learning and too much on assessment for learning.
Reference:
Cheng,
L. 1999. Changing assessment: Wash back on teacher perceptions and actions.
Teaching and Teacher
Education, 15(3), 253-271.
Gipps,
C., Clarke, S., & McCallum, B. 1998, April. The role of teachers in
national assessment in England. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting
of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California
(ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 419 836).
Silvernail,
D. 1996. The impact of England's national curriculum and assessmentsystem onclassroom
practice:
Potential lessonsfor American
reformers. Educational Policy, 10(1),46-62.
Whetton,C.,
Twist, E., & Sainsbury, M. 2000. National tests and targetsetting:
Maintainingconsistentstandards.
Paper presented at the American
Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans,
Louisiana (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 441 849).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)